Why I believe the GlaxoSmithKline share price is now too cheap to ignore

I believe the GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) share price can only go up from here.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

It seems over the past year, the GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) share price has gone nowhere but down. For the year to March 21, the FTSE 100 declined 4.5% while shares in Glaxo dropped 23%, excluding dividends.

However, over the past few weeks, the stock has recovered some ground while the rest of the market has floundered. Year-to-date, shares in Glaxo are now up by 6.4%, excluding dividends, compared to the FTSE 100’s decline of 7.2%. 

And even after this mini-rally, I believe the GlaxoSmithKline share price is too low to ignore.

The sector’s cheapest 

A quick glance at Glaxo’s valuation metrics tells you a lot about this company. The stock is currently trading at a forward P/E ratio of just 12.8 and supports a dividend yield of 5.8%. Compared to its larger US peers such as Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co and Eli Lilly and Co, which together trade at an average forward P/E of 15.7, Glaxo looks undervalued by around 19%. 

On an enterprise value to earnings, before interest tax depreciation and amortisation basis (EV/EBITDA) which factors in a company’s debt in the evaluation process, Glaxo is trading at an EV/EBITDA ratio of 10.3, compared to the sector average of 15.3.

Put simply, it shows that Glaxo is drastically undervalued compared to its peers.

What’s behind the valuation gap? 

The reason why the company is trading at this level is not so easy to explain. The stock has come under pressure partly due to worries that it may cut its dividend to fund acquisitions, and partly due to investors’ concerns that Glaxo’s growth outlook is limited.

The first of these two overhangs was laid to rest (for the time being at least) when Glaxo announced that it was pulling out of the race to buy Pfizer’s consumer healthcare unit in March. A short time after this announcement, the company announced that it had agreed to buy Novartis’s 36.5% stake in their consumer healthcare joint venture for $13bn in cash. Management believes the deal will boost earnings by about 5% in 2019 and could add even more going forward. 

What’s more, by merging the business into its existing consumer arm, management believes it can push operating margins from 17.7% to the mid-20s by 2022. 

Even though this deal means Glaxo’s debt will rise to 2.5 times operating earnings, according to City analysts, it’s unlikely to jeopardise the dividend payout. And the sale of non-core consumer nutrition products, worth an estimated £2.5bn, can alleviate any immediate pressure on the dividend. 

Too cheap to pass up? 

So, for the time being, it looks as if Glaxo’s dividend is safe. It also seems as if the company’s growth is also set to receive a boost from the above deal. In other words, I believe that the deal with Novartis has offset the primary concerns hanging over the shares.

With this being the case, and considering the firm’s deep discount to the rest of the sector, I believe the GlaxoSmithKline share price is now too cheap to ignore.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Rupert Hargreaves owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

£15,000 in cash? I’d pick growth stocks like these for life-changing passive income

Millions of us invest for passive income. Here, Dr James Fox explains his recipe for success by focusing on high-potential…

Read more »

Passive income text with pin graph chart on business table
Investing Articles

Here’s my plan for long-term passive income

On the lookout for passive income stocks to buy, Stephen Wright is turning to one of Warren Buffett’s most famous…

Read more »

artificial intelligence investing algorithms
Growth Shares

Are British stock market investors missing out on the tech revolution?

British stock market investors continue to pile into ‘old-economy’ stocks. Is this a mistake in today’s increasingly digital world?

Read more »

Fireworks display in the shape of willow at Newcastle, Co. Down , Northern Ireland at Halloween.
Investing Articles

My 2 best US growth stocks to buy in November

I’ve just bought two US growth companies on my best stocks to buy now list, and I think they’re still…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£2k in savings? Here’s how I’d invest that to target a passive income of £4,629 a year

Harvey Jones examines how investing a modest sum like £2,000 and leaving it to grow for years can generate an…

Read more »

Renewable energies concept collage
Investing Articles

Down 20%! A sinking dividend stock to buy for passive income?

This dividend stock is spending £50m buying back its own shares while they trade at a discount and also planning…

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’d buy 32,128 shares of this UK dividend stock for £200 a month in passive income

Insider buying and an 8.1% dividend yield suggest this FTSE 250 stock could be a good pick for passive income,…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

As stock markets surge, here’s what Warren Buffett’s doing

Warren Buffett has been selling his largest investments! Should investors follow in his footsteps, or is there something else going…

Read more »