Why I think Woodford was right to dump GlaxoSmithKline plc

Roland Head gives his verdict on the latest figures from GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON:GSK).

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Neil Woodford’s recent decision to dump pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) after 15 years surprised many. But after reading Mr Woodford’s Glaxit blog post, I got the feeling he’d have sold the stock sooner if he’d been able to find a suitable replacement for the income it provides.

Glaxo shares have edged lower today following the publication of the group’s half-year results. Like Mr Woodford, I sold my shares earlier this year. Based on today’s showing, I’m pleased I did.

Changes are coming

Today’s results give us our first real view of new boss Emma Walmsley’s plans for the firm. Aside from the planned sale of Horlicks, which has already been announced, we now know that Glaxo plans to stop “more than 30” pharmaceutical development programmes. The company’s Rare Diseases unit may also be sold.

The remaining pharmaceutical pipeline will be reviewed in order to allocate 80% of capital to priority assets. Meanwhile a cost reduction programme will be extended to deliver an additional £1bn of annual cost savings by 2020.

Last but not least, there will be an “enhanced focus” on cash generation and improving the group’s credit profile. Dividend growth will be put on hold until the payout is covered at least 1.25 times by free cash flow.

Get ready for a cut

Taken together, these changes suggest to me that Mr Woodford’s criticisms of Glaxo were accurate. The group’s breadth and its diversity seem to have resulted in a large number of underperforming projects.

This wasteful use of cash might have been spotted sooner if the business had been split into several more focused companies, as Woodford and others have advocated.

In the meantime, cash generation has deteriorated. Net debt rose from £13.8bn to £14.8bn during the first half of the year. Dividends were to blame. Glaxo returned £2,049m to shareholders during the period, but only generated about £1bn from free cash flow, asset sales and exchange rate gains.

Although today’s guidance indicates the dividend will be maintained at 80p in 2017 and 2018, this is subject to there being no major change in “performance expectations”. This is far from certain. I think there’s a real chance the dividend will be cut in 2018 or 2019.

Sales are still rising

Group turnover rose by 3% to £7,320m during the first half, excluding the impact of exchange rates. On the same basis, US sales rose by 5% while European sales eked out a 2% gain.

Profits improved too, although most of this was down to exchange rates. Glaxo’s adjusted operating profit for the six months to 30 June was £4,062m. That’s 21% higher than last year at actual exchange rates, but only 4% higher if exchange rate gains are ignored.

I’m staying away

The big news today wasn’t about the last six months’ trading. It was about the future. My strong feeling is that the changes announced today put the company at the start of a period of renewal.

This is unlikely to be a quick or easy process for a company of this size and complexity. My view is that there will probably be better buying opportunities over the next year or two. So I won’t be adding GlaxoSmithKline back into my portfolio just yet.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Roland Head has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Surely, the Rolls-Royce share price can’t go any higher in 2025?

The Rolls-Royce share price was the best performer on the FTSE 100 in 2023 and so far in 2024. Dr…

Read more »

A young woman sitting on a couch looking at a book in a quiet library space.
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could start buying shares with £100 in January

Our writer explains some of the things he thinks investors on a limited budget should consider before they start buying…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Forget FTSE 100 airlines! I think shares in this company offer better value to consider

Stephen Wright thinks value investors looking for shares to buy should include aircraft leasing company Aercap. But is now the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are Rolls-Royce shares undervalued heading into 2025?

As the new year approaches, Rolls-Royce shares are the top holding of a US fund recommended by Warren Buffett. But…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£20k in a high-interest savings account? It could be earning more passive income in stocks

Millions of us want a passive income, but a high-interest savings account might not be the best way to do…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 tried and tested ways to earn passive income in 2025

Our writer examines the latest market trends and economic forecasts to uncover three great ways to earn passive income in…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s what £10k invested in the FTSE 100 at the start of 2024 would be worth today

Last week's dip gives the wrong impression of the FTSE 100, which has had a pretty solid year once dividends…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK REITs: a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity?

As dividend yields hit 10-year highs, Stephen Wright thinks real estate investment trusts could be a great place to consider…

Read more »