Why Unilever plc & Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc Are Now Too Expensive For Me

Roland Head explains why he believes Unilever plc (LON:ULVR) and Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc (LON:RB) are now too expensive for new investors.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Consumer goods giants Unilever (LSE: ULVR) (NYSE: UL.US) and Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) (NASDAQOTH: RBGLY.US) are regularly cited as examples of firms where you pay a premium for quality.

Until recently, I’ve agreed with this view: in recent years I’ve purchased shares in Unilever at around 2,000p and 2,400p, and have no intention of selling them.

However, shares in both companies have climbed by between 15% and 20% over the last 12 months, and I’ve reached my limit: I won’t buy either firm at today’s prices.

Why not?

Unilever and Reckitt don’t seem to be able to meet City expectations — consensus forecasts for Unilever’s 2015 earnings have fallen from 148p to 134p over the last twelve months, leaving the firm on a 2015 forecast P/E of almost 21.

That seems too high, to me, given that in its 2014 results, Unilever warned that market conditions were not expected to improve significantly in 2015.

It’s a similar story at Reckitt, which currently trades on a 2015 forecast P/E of 23 times and offers a prospective yield of just 2.4%.

In fairness, I think the problem might be that City forecasts are too optimistic: Unilever and Reckitt have been quite open about soft conditions emerging markets in their trading updates.

Changing shape

Neither company is standing still in the face of sub-par growth.

Reckitt demerged its pharmaceuticals business into a new London-listed firm, Indivior, earlier this year, in order to sharpen its focus on its core health and hygiene ranges.

Back in December, Unilever said it would move its slow-growing spreads and margarines business into a standalone unit, a move widely seen as a precursor to a sale of this business. This would enable Unilever to focus more heavily on personal care products where profit margins and sales growth are higher.

How much would I pay?

Unilever’s adjusted earnings per share have grown by an average of less than 5% since 2009, while the equivalent figure for Reckitt is 11%.

In my view, Unilever would be more reasonably valued on a P/E of 17, which would give a yield of about 4%, and a share price of around 2,300p.

Reckitt has delivered strong growth and enjoys higher operating profit margins than Unilever, but earnings are expected to fall this year. I’d be happy to pay around 4,500p for Reckitt, which would equate to a 2015 P/E of 18, and a prospective yield of around 2.9%.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Roland Head owns shares in Unilever. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of Unilever. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

£10,000 invested in a FTSE 100 index fund in 2019 is now worth…

Charlie Carman analyses the FTSE 100's recent performance and reveals a higher-risk growth stock from the index for investors to…

Read more »

Investing Articles

The ITV share price is down 27% in 5 years. Can it recover?

ITV doubled its earnings per share last year. But the ITV share price is still well below where it stood…

Read more »

US Stock

This S&P 500 darling is down 25% in the past month! Here’s what’s going on

Jon Smith explains why a hot S&P 500 stock has dropped in the past few weeks -- and why his…

Read more »

Young woman working at modern office. Technical price graph and indicator, red and green candlestick chart and stock trading computer screen background.
Investing Articles

The Greggs share price is too tasty for me to ignore!

Christopher Ruane has been nibbling a treat at what he hopes is a bargain price. Is the Greggs share price as…

Read more »

Investing Articles

How high can the Rolls-Royce share price go in 2025? Here’s what the experts say

The Rolls-Royce share price has smashed through even the most ambitious predictions, so where does the City think it'll go…

Read more »

Investing Articles

The 2025 Stocks and Shares ISA countdown is on! It’s time to plan

It's that time of year again, to close out our 2024-25 Stocks and Shares ISA strategy and make plans for…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s the 12-month price forecast for ITV shares!

ITV shares have leapt after news of a large profits bump in 2024. Can the FTSE 250 share build on…

Read more »

photo of Union Jack flags bunting in local street party
Growth Shares

Why the FTSE 250 isn’t matching the all-time highs of the FTSE 100

Jon Smith flags a key reason why the FTSE 250 hasn't performed that well over the past year, but notes…

Read more »