Why Neil Woodford Is Avoiding Royal Dutch Shell Plc and BP plc

Royal Dutch Shell Plc (LON:RDSB) and BP plc (LON:BP) are staples for many equity income fund managers; but not Neil Woodford.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

royal dutch shellCity star Neil Woodford ditched ‘big oil’ from his hugely successful Invesco Perpetual Income and High Income funds over four years ago.

Woodford, of course, had no foreknowledge of the BP (LSE: BP) (NYSE: BP.US) oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010. Rather, he was concerned about the sustainability of BP’s dividend, and that of rival Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB) (NYSE: RDS-B.US).

Having left Invesco, Woodford has been on a two-week roadshow ahead of the launch of his new CF Woodford Equity Income Fund on 2 June. The master investor has been discussing everything from the global macro-picture to individual stocks. And he’s still not keen on BP and Shell.

Big call on big oil

BP’s dividend has been growing strongly since an enforced cut as a result of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The board hiked last year’s dividend by 8.8%, and increased this year’s first-quarter payout by 8.3%.

Shell has resumed decent dividend growth after a lacklustre few years following the financial crisis. Last year’s rise was 4.7%, and the board has upped this year’s first-quarter payout by 4.4%.

Many equity income fund managers were impressed with the first-quarter results, and the shares of BP and Shell have recently made 52-week highs of 507p and 2,592p, respectively. Woodford is maintaining his contrarian position that both dividends are at risk.

His main concern is that BP and Shell are funding dividends from asset disposals — “selling the family silver”, as he puts it — and not earnings growth. He’s also sceptical about the companies’ promises to cut capital expenditure; and, if they do, the impact on production growth and, ultimately, the dividend. He describes BP and Shell as “two very stressed organisations”.

Woodford’s position is very simple: when companies are funding their dividends by disposals, he expects a significantly higher yield as compensation. He says: “I don’t own BP or Shell, and I won’t own them until they are much better value than they are now”.

Current valuations

BP is trading at 507p at the time of writing: 10.5 times forecast 2014 earnings, with a prospective yield of 4.6%.

Shell, whose shares trade at 2,444p, is rated at 11.2 times forecast earnings, with the same 4.6% prospective income.

On the face of it, those valuations look good against the wider market. However, it seems it would take a single-digit earnings multiple and a dividend yield north of 5%, before Woodford would even consider adding BP or Shell to his new fund.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

G A Chester does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

More on Investing Articles

New year resolutions 2025 on desk. 2025 resolutions list with notebook, coffee cup on table.
Investing Articles

Legal & General has huge passive income potential with a forecast yield of almost 10% in 2025!

Harvey Jones got a fabulous rate of passive income from this top FTSE 100 dividend stock in 2024, and believes…

Read more »

Investing Articles

This stock market dip is my chance to buy cheap FTSE shares for 2025!

Harvey Jones was looking forward to a Santa Rally in December, but it looks like we're not going to get…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Analysts are saying the AstraZeneca share price looks cheap despite China turmoil

The AstraZeneca share price could be considerably undervalued according to analysts. Dr James Fox takes a closer look at the…

Read more »

Pink 3D image of the numbers '2025' growing in size
Investing Articles

1 FTSE 100 stock I expect to outperform in 2025

Can the integration of its big acquisition from 2022 finally lead Rentokil Initial to outperform the FTSE 100 next year?…

Read more »

Investing Articles

These are my top FTSE 250 REITs for earning passive income from dividends

The 90% profit distribution rule applied to REITs makes them an attractive option for dividend investors. Here are two of…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s my FTSE 250 share index prediction for 2025

The FTSE 250 index of shares has endured disappointing growth in recent times. Could 2025 be the year that it…

Read more »

Investing Articles

What will the Nvidia share price do in 2025? Here’s the chart investors need to see

Analysts are expecting sales growth of around 50% for Nvidia over the next 12 months – so why is Stephen…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Up 38%! See the stunning Glencore share price forecast for 2025

Harvey Jones thought the Glencore share price was a screaming buy 18 months ago, but it hasn't done as well…

Read more »