The hidden downside to using investment platforms

Investment platforms have revolutionised investing, enabling millions to take the plunge. But in terms of enabling shareholder participation and monitoring, their record is patchy. Thankfully, the situation is improving: many platform investors now can engage directly with companies.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Young Black woman looking concerned while in front of her laptop

Image source: Getty Images

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

When I first began buying and holding shares, there were no investment platforms. 50 years ago — and yes, alas, it was that long ago — Hargreaves Lansdown, AJ Bell, Interactive Investor and the like simply hadn’t been invented.

Full-service stockbrokers, and banks, were pretty much the only option. Real-time pricing? Or even near real-time pricing? You could pretty much forget it.

And as far as ordinary investors like you and I are concerned, I’m convinced that investment platforms have been a huge force for good.

Here be dragons

Back then, buying shares was expensive — I have no record of trading costs back in the early 1970s, but I’m looking at a dealing note from 1993, noting a commission of £31 for a £1,000 share purchase. What you got was a share certificate, which it was important not to lose.

Dividends were paid by cheque, requiring you to queue at the bank to pay them in. 

And stockbrokers — frankly — were a bit off-putting, and most ordinary folk had no idea how to go about dealing with one. Consequently, most people didn’t.

Banks were more familiar, but one needed to visit during banking hours to trade. And by ‘trade’ I mean signing a form to instruct them to buy shares, or handing over a share certificate and signing another form. And, as I say, forget real-time pricing.

Rightly, investment platforms such as Hargreaves Lansdown — which claims 1.7 million clients — have been credited with democratising investing.

Thud, thud: something heavy this way comes

But there’s one important way in which, in my view, investment platforms don’t democratise investing.

Sure, they enable investors to buy and sell at the click of a keyboard, 24 hours a day. Sure, they provide oodles of free information about shares and funds: yield, P/E ratios, price data, dividend histories, core financial data, and so on. And sure, there’s page after page after page of user-friendly educational materials.

The exception is company reports. Years ago, they used to arrive in the post: big fat envelopes, thudding on the doormat. If you held a share certificate, you got company reports — and with them, cards to vote on shareholder resolutions, and invitations to company annual general meetings.

All of which very largely doesn’t — or at least didn’t — happen with investment platforms.

Do-able? Yes. Investor-friendly? No.

Now, let’s be clear. It would be wrong of me to say that the large investment platforms are disenfranchising ordinary investors — even though last year, consumer rights champions Which? used that very word.

But you have to go looking for annual reports, and then download them, and then read them. And many people don’t. You can register to vote — but the process has traditionally, when offered, been cumbersome and awkward. And most investors haven’t bothered, even if they knew it was possible. And while it is often possible to attend company meetings, the same comments apply.

Consequently, actual shareholder participation is low. Quoting research by shareholder group ShareSoc, Which? reckons that just 1% of ordinary shareholders vote. (And that includes those holding share certificates, who return those cards.)

So two recent developments are to be lauded.

Platforms get the message

First, investment platforms — or at least some of them — are starting to make shareholder participation easier.

Last year, Interactive Investor — the UK’s second-largest platform — changed its systems so as to automatically opt all of its clients into its voting and information service.

You don’t have to vote, but you can if you want.

And Hargreaves Lansdown — the UK’s largest platform — has this year made its existing shareholder voting process easier to use, by developing an online service specifically to handle it.

Both brokerages, in my view, are to be commended.

You don’t invest through those particular platforms? Not to worry: that Which? article contains a handy table, detailing the situation at several others.

Virtual engagement

But what about company meetings themselves? These are more problematic for many investors — unless your holding in a company is worth many thousands of pounds, London-based meetings are not very feasible for investors in the regions.

(Granted, not all meetings are in London, but you get my point. And even worse are meetings held in the Channel Islands.)

Yet here, too, help is at hand. Lumi, a firm which manages investor meetings for most of the Footsie, reports a growing number of meetings now being held in hybrid format — that is, in-person and virtually. Globally, around a third of investor meetings are now hybrid.

And it’s not only investors who benefit, notes Lumi. Companies see benefits in terms of more attendees, more questions during meetings, and the opportunity to access investor viewpoints that they might otherwise not hear.

Again, this is a development to be applauded.

Digital enfranchisement

All in all, it’s a far cry from 1973, when I first went on a company’s shareholder register. (Westland Helicopters Ltd, in case you were wondering.)

As I say, investment platforms have transformed investing, and removed much of the trading ‘friction’ that reduced the likelihood of ordinary investors engaging with the stock market to build wealth. They’ve been a huge force for good.

But that engagement is a two-way process: having all these individual shareholders on the shareholder register — albeit by proxy — brings responsibilities in terms of communication and investor democracy.

It’s been a while, but it’s good to see that progress is being made.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

The Motley Fool UK has recommended Aj Bell Plc and Hargreaves Lansdown Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Close-up of British bank notes
Investing Articles

£800 invested this February could be earning a second income by the summer!

Buying a portfolio of dividend shares is a proven tactic for building a second income. Here's how it could be…

Read more »

artificial intelligence investing algorithms
Growth Shares

2 FTSE stocks that could do well with the DeepSeek AI breakthrough

Jon Smith talks through the implications of the latest AI news and flags up some FTSE shares that could benefit…

Read more »

Portrait of elderly man wearing white denim shirt and glasses looking up with hand on chin. Thoughtful senior entrepreneur, studio shot against grey background.
Investing Articles

This FTSE 250 stock’s worth more than Greggs! How mad is that?

Our writer’s left scratching his head after learning that a loss-making FTSE 250 stock is valued more highly than a…

Read more »

estate agent welcoming a couple to house viewing
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could use £20,000 of savings to target £1,289 a month of passive income!

Our writer demonstrates how it’s possible to a generate a healthy level of passive income from a portfolio of FTSE…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 bargain FTSE 100 shares that I already own!

Our writer takes a look at his own portfolio and identifies two FTSE 100 stocks he thinks offer tremendous value…

Read more »

Older couple walking in park
Investing Articles

With DeepSeek on the scene, should investors ‘go retro’ with their Stocks and Shares ISAs?

The arrival of a new AI model has caused mayhem in the tech sector. Does this mean a more old-fashioned…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

£5,000 invested in this penny stock 1 year ago is now worth…

Topps Tiles has had a miserable year. Muhammad Cheema looks at how much would have been lost if an investor…

Read more »

Investing Articles

This passive income plan is boring and unimaginative. That’s why it actually works!

Christopher Ruane explains how he is keeping things simple when it comes to earning passive income streams, using a proven…

Read more »