Shares in satellite communications group Inmarsat (LSE: ISAT) were down by 6% at as I wrote this piece, taking the stock’s one-year decline to 30%. Ouch.
This business provides satellite internet services to ships, aircraft and remote locations all over the world. Customers include most major shipping lines, airlines, oil and mining firms and governments.
In terms of service provision, Inmarsat is a market leader. But today’s share price fall doesn’t surprise me. Today’s half-year accounts confirm my view that shareholders in the group continue to face significant financial risks.
Sales up, profits down
One highlight of today’s figures was that revenue for the last six months rose by 4.9% to $717.2m, compared to the same period last year. The company said that the majority of this growth came from the aviation sector, where many airlines are adding in-flight internet services to their aircraft.
Unfortunately this increase in sales wasn’t enough to support profits. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) fell by 1.8% to $373m. The main reason for this appears to be $31.7m of extra spending on “low-margin equipment” to help capture further market share in this sector.
This suggests to me that new airline customers may be driving a hard bargain. There’s more satellite capacity than there used to be, so potential customers can afford to be choosy.
This extra spending also highlights the capital-intensive nature of the firm’s business. Inmarsat must continually invest in new equipment to maintain and improve its services. Capital spending totalled $257.8m during the first half of the year. Although this was lower than during H1 2017, it still accounted for more than one third of revenue.
Debt problems scare me
This is a profitable, market-leading business that provides good services. But in my view it has too much debt.
Net debt rose from $2,078.6m to $2,139.5m during the first half. That represents almost three times the company’s EBITDA from the last 12 months. That’s well above my preferred maximum of two times EBITDA.
The dividend has already been cut by 63%, falling from 54 cents per share in 2016 to a guided level of 20 cents per share for the current year. I think there’s a risk that this payout could be cut again.
Unless market conditions improve, I suspect Inmarsat will need to raise fresh cash by selling new shares at some point over the next few years.
One way around this problem would be for the firm to attract a trade buyer. But a recent move by French firm Eutelsat Communications failed to result in a bid, presumably because the parties couldn’t agree a price.
Not cheap enough for me
Inmarsat’s earnings have been falling steadily. This is expected to continue:
Year |
Adjusted earnings per share |
2016 |
$0.65 |
2017 |
$0.42 |
2018 (forecast) |
$0.38 |
2019 (forecast) |
$0.21 |
These forecasts put the stock on a 2018 forecast P/E of 19, rising to a P/E of 34 in 2019. Although the 2.9% dividend yield is reasonably attractive, I don’t think the shares are cheap enough to reflect the risks posed by the group’s high debt levels.
I share my colleague Rupert Hargreaves’ view that this stock is one to avoid.
I’m buying BT
I’ve been buying shares in telecoms giant BT Group (LSE: BT-A) this year. Although this FTSE 100 firm does face some challenges, I think it could be a good turnaround buy.
July’s first-quarter trading update showed that adjusted pre-tax profit rose by 3% to £816m during the first half. This improvement seems to have been driven by the group’s consumer business, where sales rose by 2% during the period and EBITDA profit rose by 10%.
BT says that this improvement was driven by growth in sales of expensive smartphones, and SIM-only mobile contracts, along with an increase in the number of customers now paying for the BT Sport television service. Operating costs stayed flat during the period, allowing the increase in revenue to flow straight through to profits.
A turnaround with legs?
Chief executive Gavin Patterson will be leaving the building later this year. Chairman Jan du Plessis took soundings from shareholders and decided that “a change of leadership” was needed to deliver Mr Patterson’s turnaround strategy.
I can’t help but agree. My view is that the CEO has been too distracted by BT Sport and has been slow to protect the group’s operating margin, which has fallen from 17.8% in 2014 to 13.3% last year. The company so far failed to take advantage of its scale, as the owner of the UK’s largest mobile and fixed broadband networks.
The good news is that Mr Patterson’s turnaround strategy should address all of these problems.
The new BT Plus service provides seamless high-speed internet across mobile and fibre broadband connections. And the £800m cost-cutting programme should deliver annual savings of £1.5bn after three years.
Jobs are being cut in some areas and added elsewhere. And the company has now agreed a pension deficit reduction programme that provides visibility on payments until June 2020.
Why I’m buying
These developments are all good news for BT shareholders, in my view. But there were two other factors that swung the decision and persuaded me to buy the shares.
The first was the appointment of City veteran Mr du Plessis as chairman. This South African businessman has an impressive track record of turning around big companies. Most recently he led miner Rio Tinto from 2009 until 2018.
The second factor was that I thought the shares were starting to look too cheap. Even in its present condition, BT is expected to generate normalised free cash flow of between £2.3bn and £2.5bn this year. That values the shares at roughly 10 times free cash flow, which looks tempting to me.
Income investors will probably be tempted by the 6.6% yield that’s currently on offer. Personally I think there’s a good chance this payout will be cut by Mr Patterson’s replacement, to help fund pension payments and debt reduction.
But with the shares trading on just 8.8 times forecast earnings, I still think BT is too cheap to ignore.