Hurrah! Hedge fund fees are falling!

Fees are still too high, and you can do better with your money.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

I’ve got some good news for you – but perhaps not for the reason you’d first think…

Here it is: hedge funds across the world are cutting their fees.
 
Perhaps you’re thinking: “Great – maybe I can put some of my pension into one of these high-flying funds and get rich with the big boys!”
 
Or maybe: “Who cares – I am not an oligarch with a few million pounds to invest. This news is irrelevant to me!”
 
Well, sorry to be a know-it-all, but I think both responses are wrong in their different ways.
 
Firstly, if you want to put money into hedge funds, you probably shouldn’t.
 
And if you don’t care at all about hedge funds, you probably should – if only for a slightly philosophical reason.
 
Allow me to explain.

Hedge fund haircuts

Firstly: those shrinking fees.
 
According to industry monitor Eurekahedge, the average annual management fee charged by the 2,600-odd hedge funds it tracks across the globe is now 1.39% of the value of client assets.
 
That’s down from 1.44% in 2015, and about 1.68% a decade ago.
 
According to Reuters, Eurekahedge has found performance fees are falling, too.
 
The standard hedge fund fee model has always been known as “2 and 20”, reflecting a fund’s 2% annual charge and 20% take of the profits.
 
However, in reality the performance fee has been cut from an average of 18.77% in 2007 to 16.69% today.
 
Strangely, the language of hedge funds hasn’t yet caught up.

I guess that “1.39 and 16.69” doesn’t sound as slick as “2 and 20” in the wine bars of Mayfair.

Performance fees eat your wealth

In any event, today’s lowered fees are still enormous. You can try running a few examples with a compound interest calculator to see the massive impact of losing 3-4% a year on your returns over a few decades.
 
Now, you might argue that if hedge funds deliver superb returns then the fees are worth it.
 
But even if your fund achieves returns similar to the legendary stock picker Warren Buffett, paying “2 and 20” – or anything like it – will leave you with a fraction of your potential returns.
 
The outspoken fund manager Terry Smith once worked out that an investor who put $1,000 into Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway back in 1965 would have seen it grow to $4.3m by 2010.
 
By contrast, he calculated that if Buffett had been charging “2 and 20” on Berkshire’s returns, the investor would have a mere $300,000.
 
Think on that: $4.3m versus $300,000.
 
That’s the impact of high fees, on the returns of one of the very best investors of all time, who enjoyed a better-than-20% a year record.

Rotten returns

While we can’t be reminded too often about the impact of high fees, it’s actually pretty moot these days with hedge funds.
 
You see, they are not delivering returns anything like Warren Buffett.
 
In fact, hedge funds are not delivering returns anything like a simple – and cheap – index tracker fund.
 
The hedge fund industry’s average return on investment in 2016 after fees is just 3.4%, according to the Barclays Hedge Fund Index.
 
In 2015 it was 0.04%.
 
In 2014 it was 2.9%.
 
True, the average was 11.1% back in 2013 – but that was the year the key S&P 500 benchmark rose 32.4%!
 
These figures are frankly woeful.
 
Now, hedge fund defenders always moan that you shouldn’t compare a hedge fund to an index fund, because supposedly sophisticated hedge fund techniques make them less volatile and lower risk.
 
On current evidence, this looks like nonsense, too.

With hedge fund returns so miniscule, there are other ways to match or beat their returns with lower risk and volatility.
 
You could, for instance, invest just half your potential money in a global tracker fund, and keep the rest in cash.
 
But don’t take my word for it.
 
Investment manager SCM Direct calculates that over the past five years, a simple 60/40 strategy (60% in equities and 40% in bonds) would have delivered 3-4 times the return of the average hedge fund.
 
This 60/40 approach requires you to buy just two cheap index tracker funds. That’s it.
 
Of course, it doesn’t buy hedge fund managers many sports cars.
 
But that’s their problem, not yours.

Too big to prevail

 Why have hedge funds got to this laughable position where they’re posting rubbish returns, cutting fees, and being roundly trounced by the cheapest funds money can buy?
 
Many reasons have been put forward, from the increasing efficiency of the stock market to the dampening of volatility caused by years of low rates to the impact of insider-trading convictions a few years ago.
 
But a key reason is surely that the hedge fund sector is just too vast.
 
You see, despite the dire returns, people with literally more money than sense continue to pour money into hedge funds.
 
As of the second quarter of 2016, there was around $3.4 trillion invested in hedge funds – close to the all-time high.
 
Sure, these funds follow a variety of different strategies.
 
But $3.4 trillion is $3.4 trillion, however you slice and dice it.

I believe there’s just too much supposedly smart money chasing the same opportunities. As a result, the high returns of yesteryear have been arbitraged away.

A win for mass affluence

I hope you can now see why I don’t think you should want to put money into hedge funds, even if fees are falling.
 
They’re still far, far too high. And the returns aren’t worth it anyway.
 
If you want to reduce the risk in your portfolio, just sell some of your shares and buy bonds or hold cash instead.
 
Wait! Didn’t I say it was good news that hedge fund fees are down?
 
Well, yes. But that’s almost from a political angle as much as investment one.
 
I find it pleasing there’s no evidence that, in general, the very rich can access far more lucrative investments than you and me.
 
These falling fees reflect that reality. Even hedge funds can’t hide behind their mystique forever.
 
Of course, there will always be some hedge funds that beat the market – just like some vanilla fund managers might, and just like you or I might try to do with our own stock picking.

But the statistics don’t lie. Most funds fail to deliver decent returns after fees and they charge through the roof to do it.
 
Investing is truly democratic, it seems.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

5 steps to start buying shares with under £500

Learn how this writer would start buying shares with a few hundred pounds in a handful of steps, if he…

Read more »

Young happy white woman loading groceries into the back of her car
Investing Articles

The FTSE 100 offers some great bargains. Is this one?

Our writer digs into one FTSE 100 share that has had a rough 2024 to date, ahead of its interim…

Read more »

Smiling white woman holding iPhone with Airpods in ear
Investing Articles

£9,000 of savings? Here’s my 3-step approach to aim for £1,794 in passive income

Christopher Ruane walks through the practical steps he would take to try and turn £9,000 into a sizeable passive income…

Read more »

Group of young friends toasting each other with beers in a pub
Investing Articles

I’d buy 29,412 shares of this UK dividend stock for £150 a month in passive income

Insiders have been buying this dividend stock, which offers an 8.5% yield. Roland Head explains why he’d choose the shares…

Read more »

Red briefcase with the words Budget HM Treasury embossed in gold
Investing Articles

Could the new UK budget spell growth for these 6 FTSE stocks? I think so!

Mark David Hartley considers six UK stocks that could enjoy growth off the back of new measures announced in the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

With a 6.6% yield, is now the right time to add this income stock to my ISA?

Our writer’s looking to boost his Stocks and Shares ISA. With this in mind, he’s debating whether to buy a…

Read more »

Dividend Shares

This blue-chip FTSE stock just fell 12.5% in a day. Is it time to consider buying?

Smith & Nephew is a well-known, blue-chip FTSE stock with a decent dividend yield. And its share price just dropped…

Read more »

Investing Articles

At 72p, the Vodafone share price looks to be at least 33% undervalued to me

Our writer looks at a number of valuation measures to determine whether the Vodafone share price reflects the fair value…

Read more »