Today’s Winners Could Be Tomorrow’s Sinners

Few of us invest in tobacco firms or vodka makers without giving at least some thought to the moral dimension… but what if meat and sugar were also off the menu?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The latest food scare story had some real meat to it.
 
In fact, meat was the dish of the day.
 
New guidance from the World Health Organisation (WHO) says that processed meats like sausages and bacon can cause cancer.
 
Even worse for carnivores, it said red meats of all sorts – maybe just a hearty Sunday roast – probably does cause cancer, too.
 
As you’d expect, debate ensued and many people said the risks (or at least the media’s coverage of the risks) were being exaggerated.
 
I’ll leave that to you, Google, and your own dining habits.
 
What’s interesting to me is how such swings in taste might affect our long-term investments.

More than lip service

Take a company like the US burrito chain Chipotle Mexican Grill.
 
It’s no exaggeration to say that among my US colleagues at The Motley Fool this company is beloved.
 
No wonder, if you look at the share price – up 1,400% since it came to market in 2006.
 
And many of our US newsletter services have been along for at least part of that ride.
 
But it’s not just the financial performance that impresses us Fools.
 
The company treats staff well, for example, at least by the standards of the hospitality industry. Its well-paid managers often worked their way up from the humblest starter positions.
 
Chipotle has also raised the bar far above standard fast food fare when it comes to ingredients and quality.
 
Where possible it sources locally produced organic foods and it’s trying to eliminate genetically modified stuff from its menus, too.
 
As for the meat that stuffs its burritos, Chipotle looks for pasture raised dairy and responsibly raised livestock.
 
And this is not just lip service.
 
When Chipotle became concerned about the animal welfare credentials of one of its suppliers early this year, it yanked pork ‘carnitas’ off its menu in many stores – a significant move given the little snacks make up about 6% of its revenues.
 
It was just another example of the sort of conscientious capitalism that drew Foolish investors to the company in the first place.

Puff baddies

Will things look so rosy if it turns out Chipotle has been helping its young and passionate millennial customers to get cancer?
 
No more than McDonalds or the local steakhouse have, of course, but just going on the logic of those new WHO recommendations.
 
It sounds fanciful. But health stories invariably do in the early days.
 
For a comparison, in the 1930s and ’40s cigarette makers could still get doctors to endorse their deadly products in advertising. 
 
Cigarettes were known to cause coughing, but it would take decades for everyone to believe the solid link to cancer.
 
As late as 1960s, only one-third of doctors thought fags were the smoking gun that had caused lung cancer rates to skyrocket.

Trick or treat?

It seems unlikely to me that red meat eating will ever be spoken about in the same wheezy breath as smoking, but that’s not the point.
 
And I’m no doctor, anyway – but luckily you’re not reading me for medical advice.
 
The point I’m making is that even the most beloved products and brands of one era can look very different from a subsequent vantage point, when new knowledge comes to light.
 
For another example – one that lies somewhere between cigarettes and this sausage scare in terms of the evolving story – look at sugar.
 
Virtually everyone now understands that too much sugar makes you fat, and that this can contribute to a range of grim illnesses, from diabetes to heart disease.
 
More recently, a link between sugar and cancer has emerged, too.
 
Where does this leave a company like The Coca-Cola Company, whose brand was once as bright and wholesome as apple pie?
 
Or, closer to home, A.G. Barr, the manufacturer of the marmite-y Scottish drink Irn-Bru, which could conceivably face a sugar tax in the UK if celebrity chef Jamie Oliver gets his way?
 
Even a modern globe-spanning titan like Starbucks Corporation could be hit if you consider the sheer volume of sugar that augments its coffee, or resides in the treats that it sends out the door.
 
Again, Starbucks is a beloved stock among US Fools, who laud its staff-friendly policies and its customer-centric business model.
 
But what if…?

The wages of sin

Legendary money man Warren Buffett has often said he loves his big investment in Coca-Cola because he is highly confident that more people will be drinking more Coke in the future – especially compared to how much less certain he can be about the earnings of, say, a technology company or a mining outfit.
 
And Buffett is surely right.
 
Even if sugar does come to be seen as a public health hazard, it will be decades – if ever – before it completely drops off the menu.
 
People still smoke and drink in their billions, after all.
 
But it’s fascinating to me that even these companies whose products are often considered bombproof could face existential threats.
 
Note, though, that doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily be bad investments, even if public attitudes do change.
 
Academics have found so-called ‘sin stocks’ like tobacco companies have handily beaten the market in the past.
 
One theory is that some squeamish investors (like me) refuse to put their money into cigarette manufacturers for non-financial reasons, which gives those who do the chance to outperform.
 
Will the same be true of sausage makers like Cranswick and sugar treat purveyors Patisserie Holdings some day?

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Owain owns shares in A.G. Barr. The Motley Fool UK has no interest in any of the shares mentioned.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

5 steps to start buying shares with under £500

Learn how this writer would start buying shares with a few hundred pounds in a handful of steps, if he…

Read more »

Young happy white woman loading groceries into the back of her car
Investing Articles

The FTSE 100 offers some great bargains. Is this one?

Our writer digs into one FTSE 100 share that has had a rough 2024 to date, ahead of its interim…

Read more »

Smiling white woman holding iPhone with Airpods in ear
Investing Articles

£9,000 of savings? Here’s my 3-step approach to aim for £1,794 in passive income

Christopher Ruane walks through the practical steps he would take to try and turn £9,000 into a sizeable passive income…

Read more »

Group of young friends toasting each other with beers in a pub
Investing Articles

I’d buy 29,412 shares of this UK dividend stock for £150 a month in passive income

Insiders have been buying this dividend stock, which offers an 8.5% yield. Roland Head explains why he’d choose the shares…

Read more »

Red briefcase with the words Budget HM Treasury embossed in gold
Investing Articles

Could the new UK budget spell growth for these 6 FTSE stocks? I think so!

Mark David Hartley considers six UK stocks that could enjoy growth off the back of new measures announced in the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

With a 6.6% yield, is now the right time to add this income stock to my ISA?

Our writer’s looking to boost his Stocks and Shares ISA. With this in mind, he’s debating whether to buy a…

Read more »

Dividend Shares

This blue-chip FTSE stock just fell 12.5% in a day. Is it time to consider buying?

Smith & Nephew is a well-known, blue-chip FTSE stock with a decent dividend yield. And its share price just dropped…

Read more »

Investing Articles

At 72p, the Vodafone share price looks to be at least 33% undervalued to me

Our writer looks at a number of valuation measures to determine whether the Vodafone share price reflects the fair value…

Read more »