Will Jeremy Corbyn Hurt Your Portfolio?

A Jeremy Corbyn manifesto could target our wallets and the businesses we invest in… however, UK stock market returns are driven more by the global economy than by Westminster.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

So the impossible has proven not just possible but palatable, with 500-1 outsider and left-winger Jeremy Corbyn elevated from the backbenches to the leadership of Labour party.
 
It’s fascinating to ponder what this says about British politics.
 
But the sworn duty of The Collective is to explore the investing perspective, not the political dimension.
 
In short: what does Jeremy Corbyn mean for your ISA?

Wrong for right-wing reasons

To spoil the suspense, I’ll say that in my opinion, paying too much attention to politics – especially which party happens to be in power – can impair your investing judgement.
 
When it comes to the long bull market in US shares over the past six years, for instance, I noticed some US fund managers and pundits were sceptical from the start on ideological grounds.
 
They didn’t like what they saw as a leftist and interventionist Democratic administration under President Barack Obama.
 
And they believed near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing (QE) under Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was irresponsible, too.
 
Never mind that the Credit Crisis had bubbled up under the Republican’s term, or that QE benefits shares and other assets.
 
Nor the old adage that says, “Never fight the Fed”, on the grounds that cheap money will always be good for markets while it lasts.
 
Fight the Fed is just what such sceptics did.
 
Motivated by their political beliefs, they advocated a reduced exposure to US equities and bonds and favoured gold.
 
Some explicitly said owning the precious metal was a way to bet against the US dollar and protect oneself from the wayward policies of the US government.
 
It was a bad decision. Gold soon slumped while US government bonds and equities went on a tear.

Same crash, different politics

As if to prove the irrelevance of which party is in power for investors, we saw the flipside in the UK.
 
Our own financial crisis was incubated and unleashed under a Labour government, in contrast to that rightwing US Republican one.
 
And whereas it was the Democratic Party in the US that had to deal with the aftermath, in the UK Labour bailed out the banking system, then passed the reins on to the Conservative/Liberal Democrat Coalition.
 
Yet despite these supposedly more market-friendly parties being in power, our market did worse in the post-crash aftermath than the US under the much-maligned President Obama.
 
Again, politics was a poor guide to investing outcomes.

It’s the economy, stupid

Now you might be thinking, “Hang on, you guys have pointed out many times how the UK market is dominated by energy and mining outfits, and companies with emerging market exposure. And we all know they’ve done about as well recently as Liz Kendall in a Labour leadership election. Surely that is why the UK is lagging the US?”
 
To which I say – exactly.
 
At least over the short run, under- or over-valuation of assets, investor confidence, and where we are in the economic cycle are far more consequential to your investment returns than the ballot box.

Equities up under all parties

Of course, specific government edicts can certainly have direct consequences on our portfolios and wealth.
 
To give some recent examples – the punitive changes to dividend taxation announced in the most recent Conservative Budget, the Pension freedoms set in train by the Coalition and the Labour-managed bailout of Lloyds (LSE: LLOY) and RBS (LSE: RBS) have all impacted most UK investors.
 
But when it comes to the stock market itself, statistics show that UK equities have advanced under both Labour and the Conservatives.
 
Data covering the 45 years between 1970 and the General Election this May, for instance, showed the UK stock market rose 16% a year on average under the Conservatives versus 9% a year under Labour.
 
That might seem to give the Tories the lead as the party for investors, but don’t forget the global events that partly drove those returns, from the oil crisis in the 1970s and the global market liberalisations of the 1980s to the banking bust of 2008 and 2009.
 
While politicians played a hand in all those events, the ones that had to deal with the consequences, as I’ve discussed above, were very often not the ones who presided over their genesis.

Company concerns

The same data shows UK company profits grew 11% a year over the period under the Conservatives versus 6% a year under Labour.
 
That seems more ominous (though still subject to the same caveats) and the thought of Jeremy Corbyn in Number 10 will be a talking point for businesses in the weeks and months ahead.
 
Corbyn has already appointed a left-wing ally John McDonnell as shadow chancellor, for instance.
 
McDonnell says capitalism is “failing”, and he’s called for the banks and railways to be nationalised, for the top rate of income tax to increase to 60%, and for politicians to regain control of interest rates from the Bank of England.
 
This sort of talk is sure to send a collective shiver through the boardrooms of Britain.

What about the workers?

That is not to say that there are not legitimate questions to ask about the economic machine – even viewed solely through the narrowest lens of our interest as shareholders.
 
Rightly or wrongly, many people were dismayed by the financial crisis, and feel not enough has been done to prevent a recurrence.
 
Others have argued that the record profit margins being reported in many industry sectors is unsustainable – and that the proliferation of share buybacks has benefitted shareholders at the expense of workers on static salaries, as well as underinvestment in the skills and technology that can best grow the economy.
 
That inequality has increased in the UK and US is much discussed, and it partly explains Corbyn’s appeal.
 
And arguably, such inequality is not a particularly healthy backdrop for business, either, which after all needs to sell its goods to a wider constituency than London estate agents and oligarchs.
 
Thus more left-wing arguments about business than have been heard in the UK for many decades could well find some support.

Manifesto destiny

We’ll have to wait to see what Mr Corbyn proposes to do about these issues to judge their potential support among the British electorate – and hence their impact on the markets.
 
But it’s worth remembering that Corbyn cannot escape the same restraints on radical action faced by any other government, such as the advance of globalisation and automation, and the footloose nature of international capital.
 
A Labour manifesto under Corbyn would likely pledge to raise the minimum wage paid by businesses, tax profits more heavily, and potentially try to encourage investment – perhaps with his controversial People’s QE proposal, which would see the UK issue more debt to invest in infrastructure.
 
The latter might hit the value of the pound if international investors felt it put the UK’s solvency into doubt, but then a weak pound might help the UK manufacturers and exporters — the sector of business Corbyn is most likely to favour.
 
His stance on Europe might also influence the appeal of British companies to foreign investors, especially if he campaigns for the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union.

Taxing questions

Higher personal rates of taxation would also seem inevitable under a Corbyn government, with perhaps more curbs on the likes of ISA contributions and pension reliefs too.
 
Again, even some Collective readers might argue that with the rich seemingly getting richer and the country still in hock for trillions, such policies make sense.
 
It’ll certainly be interesting to hear the debate in the months ahead.
 
But for now, I doubt the electorate is ready to back such an agenda.
 
Thus Corbyn’s influence on our finances is most likely to be restricted to whatever pull leftwards his opposition can exert on the elected Government’s policy on matters like taxation and regulation.
 
While Jeremy Corbyn’s election has enlivened UK politics, I don’t think he’ll matter to our investments in the foreseeable future.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Surely, the Rolls-Royce share price can’t go any higher in 2025?

The Rolls-Royce share price was the best performer on the FTSE 100 in 2023 and so far in 2024. Dr…

Read more »

A young woman sitting on a couch looking at a book in a quiet library space.
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could start buying shares with £100 in January

Our writer explains some of the things he thinks investors on a limited budget should consider before they start buying…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Forget FTSE 100 airlines! I think shares in this company offer better value to consider

Stephen Wright thinks value investors looking for shares to buy should include aircraft leasing company Aercap. But is now the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are Rolls-Royce shares undervalued heading into 2025?

As the new year approaches, Rolls-Royce shares are the top holding of a US fund recommended by Warren Buffett. But…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£20k in a high-interest savings account? It could be earning more passive income in stocks

Millions of us want a passive income, but a high-interest savings account might not be the best way to do…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 tried and tested ways to earn passive income in 2025

Our writer examines the latest market trends and economic forecasts to uncover three great ways to earn passive income in…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s what £10k invested in the FTSE 100 at the start of 2024 would be worth today

Last week's dip gives the wrong impression of the FTSE 100, which has had a pretty solid year once dividends…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK REITs: a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity?

As dividend yields hit 10-year highs, Stephen Wright thinks real estate investment trusts could be a great place to consider…

Read more »