Why Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc And Unilever plc Are ALWAYS Undervalued

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc (LON: RB) and Unilever plc (LON: ULVR) are worth paying a premium for.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Charlie Munger is one of the most prominent investors in the world. Charlie runs Berkshire Hathaway, along with Warren Buffett. So, when Munger speaks, it pays to listen. 

Charlie is famous for his slow-and-steady, buy-and-hold style of investing. He likes to buy great companies and sit on them for decades. Great companies just like Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) and Unilever (LSE: ULVR).

A great result 

Charlie Munger’s logic is simple. If you buy a good business with a great set of products, over time the returns generated from the business will stack up. As a result, even if you pay a high price for the business, you’ll end up with fine results. 

Key to this concept is a company’s return on capital employed. Simply put, ROCE is a telling and straightforward gauge for comparing the relative profitability levels of companies. The ratio measures how much money is coming out of a business, relative to how much is going in and is a great way to measure business success.

Company ROCE figures can vary dramatically from year to year but if you can find a company with stable ROCE that’s higher than the market average, you’re onto a winner. 

According to my figures, only one third of the world’s 8,000 largest companies managed to achieve an ROCE of greater than 10% last year. However, over the past 10 years Unilever’s average annual ROCE has been in the region of 22%. Reckitt’s has come closer to 30% per annum.

These figures show that Unilever and Reckitt are both quality business, which are able to achieve some of the highest levels of profitability around. 

Paying a premium

With this in mind, it makes sense to pay a premium to get your hands on Unilever and Reckitt’s shares. At present levels, Reckitt trades at a forward P/E of 25.4 and offers a dividend yield of 2.1%. Unilever currently trades at a forward P/E of 22.2 and is set to yield 3.1% this year. 

Usually, I would be wary of such lofty valuations. P/E ratios in the mid-20s usually indicate that the market has high hopes for the company in question. Unfortunately, more often than not the company fails to live up to expectations. But the same logic doesn’t apply to Unilever and Reckitt. 

Indeed, the two companies produce a selection of essential everyday household items, the sales of which are easy to predict. Therefore the businesses are defensive by nature and the high returns on capital should be sustainable.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Rupert Hargreaves has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of Unilever. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Why I’ve just sold two of the largest investments in my Stocks and Shares ISA

Stephen Wright has been making room for a new addition to his Stocks and Shares ISA. What is it and…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 UK shares I’m avoiding like the plague in today’s stock market

Stephen Wright is a big fan of UK shares. But both the FTSE 100 and the FTSE 250 contain companies…

Read more »

Investing Articles

With yields over 8.8%, which of the FTSE 100’s top 5 passive income stocks do I think is the best?

These five passive income stocks are all yielding more than 8.8%. Our writer considers which of them (if any) would…

Read more »

Investing Articles

At 538p, is the Rolls-Royce share price really that expensive?

The Rolls-Royce share price has continued its incredible post-pandemic rally causing many to ask whether the stock’s overvalued. Our writer…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

The best investment quote of all time didn’t come from Warren Buffett!

Warren Buffett’s pithy quotes are both relevant and insightful. But the American billionaire didn’t come up with our writer’s favourite.

Read more »

Investing Articles

Down 13.7% in 7 days, what’s going on with the Lloyds share price?

Our writer looks at recent movements in the Lloyds share price. And asks whether now could be a good time…

Read more »

Dividend Shares

Here’s a simple 5-stock dividend income portfolio with a 7.5% yield

With these five British dividend stocks, one could potentially generate income of around £750 per year from a £10,000 investment.

Read more »

Investing Articles

If I’d put £10,000 into the FTSE 100’s biggest stock at the start of 2024, here’s what I’d have now

The FTSE 100’s biggest company has romped away from the index over the last five years, but has fallen behind…

Read more »