Why Unilever plc & Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc Are Now Too Expensive For Me

Roland Head explains why he believes Unilever plc (LON:ULVR) and Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc (LON:RB) are now too expensive for new investors.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Consumer goods giants Unilever (LSE: ULVR) (NYSE: UL.US) and Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) (NASDAQOTH: RBGLY.US) are regularly cited as examples of firms where you pay a premium for quality.

Until recently, I’ve agreed with this view: in recent years I’ve purchased shares in Unilever at around 2,000p and 2,400p, and have no intention of selling them.

However, shares in both companies have climbed by between 15% and 20% over the last 12 months, and I’ve reached my limit: I won’t buy either firm at today’s prices.

Why not?

Unilever and Reckitt don’t seem to be able to meet City expectations — consensus forecasts for Unilever’s 2015 earnings have fallen from 148p to 134p over the last twelve months, leaving the firm on a 2015 forecast P/E of almost 21.

That seems too high, to me, given that in its 2014 results, Unilever warned that market conditions were not expected to improve significantly in 2015.

It’s a similar story at Reckitt, which currently trades on a 2015 forecast P/E of 23 times and offers a prospective yield of just 2.4%.

In fairness, I think the problem might be that City forecasts are too optimistic: Unilever and Reckitt have been quite open about soft conditions emerging markets in their trading updates.

Changing shape

Neither company is standing still in the face of sub-par growth.

Reckitt demerged its pharmaceuticals business into a new London-listed firm, Indivior, earlier this year, in order to sharpen its focus on its core health and hygiene ranges.

Back in December, Unilever said it would move its slow-growing spreads and margarines business into a standalone unit, a move widely seen as a precursor to a sale of this business. This would enable Unilever to focus more heavily on personal care products where profit margins and sales growth are higher.

How much would I pay?

Unilever’s adjusted earnings per share have grown by an average of less than 5% since 2009, while the equivalent figure for Reckitt is 11%.

In my view, Unilever would be more reasonably valued on a P/E of 17, which would give a yield of about 4%, and a share price of around 2,300p.

Reckitt has delivered strong growth and enjoys higher operating profit margins than Unilever, but earnings are expected to fall this year. I’d be happy to pay around 4,500p for Reckitt, which would equate to a 2015 P/E of 18, and a prospective yield of around 2.9%.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Roland Head owns shares in Unilever. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of Unilever. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Red briefcase with the words Budget HM Treasury embossed in gold
Investing Articles

Could the new UK budget spell growth for these 6 FTSE stocks? I think so!

Mark David Hartley considers six UK stocks that could enjoy growth off the back of new measures announced in the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

With a 6.6% yield, is now the right time to add this income stock to my ISA?

Our writer’s looking to boost his Stocks and Shares ISA. With this in mind, he’s debating whether to buy a…

Read more »

Dividend Shares

This blue-chip FTSE stock just fell 12.5% in a day. Is it time to consider buying?

Smith & Nephew is a well-known, blue-chip FTSE stock with a decent dividend yield. And its share price just dropped…

Read more »

Investing Articles

At 72p, the Vodafone share price looks to be at least 33% undervalued to me

Our writer looks at a number of valuation measures to determine whether the Vodafone share price reflects the fair value…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Why I’ve just sold two of the largest investments in my Stocks and Shares ISA

Stephen Wright has been making room for a new addition to his Stocks and Shares ISA. What is it and…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 UK shares I’m avoiding like the plague in today’s stock market

Stephen Wright is a big fan of UK shares. But both the FTSE 100 and the FTSE 250 contain companies…

Read more »

Investing Articles

At 538p, is the Rolls-Royce share price really that expensive?

The Rolls-Royce share price has continued its incredible post-pandemic rally causing many to ask whether the stock’s overvalued. Our writer…

Read more »

Investing Articles

With yields over 8.8%, which of the FTSE 100’s top 5 passive income stocks do I think is the best?

These five passive income stocks are all yielding more than 8.8%. Our writer considers which of them (if any) would…

Read more »