Why GlaxoSmithKline plc Is Down 17% This Year

Will 2015 be a better year for GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON:GSK) shareholders?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

It’s been a slightly uncomfortable year for GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) shareholders, who have watched their firm’s shares underperform the FTSE 100 by a significant margin, falling 17% compared to the FTSE’s more modest decline of 5%.

A year isn’t very long, but Glaxo hasn’t done very well over the last five years, either: as I write, Glaxo’s share price is just 3% higher than it was five years ago. That’s pretty poor, considering that the FTSE has gained 23% over the same period.

A bad year?

In fairness to Glaxo, it’s only really in 2014 that the pharma firm has seriously dropped behind the wider market.

The year started quite well, with news of a complex asset-swap deal with Novartis, which should strengthen both companies’ portfolios when it completes in the first half of next year.

The deal also includes an 82p per share capital return for Glaxo shareholders, and was well-received by the market.

News of a Serious Fraud Office into the firm’s sales practices was less impressive, but markets tend to brush over this kind of misconduct unless it affects the bottom line.

The real problem…

The real trouble started in July, when Glaxo published its interim results. Operating profit fell by 27% during the first half of the year, while earnings per share were down 34%. Although these falls were made worse by currency fluctuations, the underlying figures weren’t great, either.

Glaxo warned that a lack of free cash flow meant that share buybacks were likely to tail off during the second half of this year, and said that full-year adjusted earnings were no expected to be similar to 2013.

The shares fell by 12% in two weeks.

Will 2015 be better?

The pharma business can be very profitable: the UK’s three biggest firms, Glaxo, AstraZeneca and Shire have an average operating profit margin of 25%.

Both Glaxo and AstraZeneca have struggled to overcome the impact of patent expiration on key products over the last couple of years, and this may continue to affect earnings for a little longer. However, I’m in no doubt that the medium to long-term outlook for big pharma stocks is very attractive: this remains a genuine growth sector.

Seen in this light, Glaxo’s 2015 forecast P/E of 14.3 and prospective yield of 6.0% look extremely tempting, and the firm remains on my buy list for 2015.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Roland Head owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Middle-aged black male working at home desk
Investing Articles

Here’s how I’m trying to build up my ISA to earn £10,000 passive income each year

I've been working to build some passive income for my retirement for years. Here's how I'm using the stock market…

Read more »

Elevated view over city of London skyline
Investing Articles

Could this 5.8%-yielding FTSE 250 share storm back in 2025?

Christopher Ruane weighs some pros and cons of a FTSE 250 share he owns that has had a rough few…

Read more »

British union jack flag and Parliament house at city of Westminster in the background
Investing Articles

Kier Starmer aims to make the UK an AI superpower! 2 FTSE stocks are poised to benefit

This pair of FTSE stocks look set to benefit long term as the UK government plans to tap into the…

Read more »

British Pennies on a Pound Note
Investing Articles

Was this penny stock a silly purchase?

This penny stock has fallen in value by over half in the past five years. Here our writer explains why…

Read more »

Aerial shot showing an aircraft shadow flying over an idyllic beach
Investing Articles

After a stunning 2024, could IAG shares still go higher from here?

Christopher Ruane explains why he sees some grounds for optimism that IAG shares could move even higher -- and whether…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Searching for passive income? Here are 2 top dividend growth shares to consider!

These FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 dividend shares are tipped to lift dividends over the next two to three years,…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Should I buy 29,761 shares in this FTSE 250 dividend REIT for £1,000 a year in passive income?

Stephen Wright's wondering whether it's a good idea to buy shares in a FTSE 250 REIT with a highly reliable…

Read more »

Dividend Shares

A 12.65% yield? Here’s the dividend forecast for this FTSE income share

Jon Smith talks through the2026/27 dividend forecast for an income stock that already has a double-digit yield but could go…

Read more »