Will GlaxoSmithKline plc And AstraZeneca plc Make You Rich In 2015?

AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) thrashed GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) in 2014, but Harvey Jones says their roles could reverse next year

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

After falling 14% in 2014, GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) certainly won’t have made you rich this year.

AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) has put on a spectacular show, by contrast, rising 26% this year.

Glaxo loses, Astra wins. But who will come top in 2015?

All That Glisters

Glaxo is due a good year. Its shares are up just over 3% over five years, a shockingly poor performance from a FTSE 100 stalwart.

A couple of years ago, AstraZeneca was thought to be the one in trouble, thanks to falling profits and a failing drugs pipeline. Now it’s the UK pharma golden boy, up 60% over five years. Astra has the momentum, but Glaxo tempts my contrarian instincts.

Troubled Times

Glaxo has been caught up in the recent sell-off, taking its price/earnings ratio to below 12 and its yield to a tempting 6%. Given the shrinking chance of a base rate hike next year, it is almost worth buying on income alone.

Management is frantically restructuring, as it looks to put the bribery scandal behind it, reverse falling US revenues, and focus on its core disease areas such as respiratory, infectious diseases, vaccines and consumer healthcare.

Earnings per share (EPS) look set to fall 18% this year, but are forecast to claw their way back to zero in 2015.

Recovery play

Glaxo has a big job on its hands, especially with a recent drop in R&D productivity, and a hefty debt-to-equity ratio of 2.57. The key question is whether it can reverse its sliding earnings. That’s in the balance right now.

But if Glaxo does show Astra-like powers of recovery, it could make you rich in 2015 and beyond.

Astra Ascendant

The numbers look far nicer at AstraZeneca, with strong share price growth, a 4% yield, 14.4% operating margins, and 33% return-on-capital employed.

The only blot is a Glaxo-like 17% drop in EPS this year, followed by another 4% in 2015. Every time another patent expires, a little piece of Astra’s EPS dies.

It needs to keep the new drugs flowing, but there is good news on that score, with 107 projects in the clinical phase of development.

At 14 times earnings, Astra is valued more highly than Glaxo, and rightly so. These two companies have undergone a dramatic role reversal lately. Glaxo is now the riskier stock, but at today’s reduced price, potentially more rewarding.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Harvey Jones has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Surely, the Rolls-Royce share price can’t go any higher in 2025?

The Rolls-Royce share price was the best performer on the FTSE 100 in 2023 and so far in 2024. Dr…

Read more »

A young woman sitting on a couch looking at a book in a quiet library space.
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could start buying shares with £100 in January

Our writer explains some of the things he thinks investors on a limited budget should consider before they start buying…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Forget FTSE 100 airlines! I think shares in this company offer better value to consider

Stephen Wright thinks value investors looking for shares to buy should include aircraft leasing company Aercap. But is now the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are Rolls-Royce shares undervalued heading into 2025?

As the new year approaches, Rolls-Royce shares are the top holding of a US fund recommended by Warren Buffett. But…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£20k in a high-interest savings account? It could be earning more passive income in stocks

Millions of us want a passive income, but a high-interest savings account might not be the best way to do…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 tried and tested ways to earn passive income in 2025

Our writer examines the latest market trends and economic forecasts to uncover three great ways to earn passive income in…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s what £10k invested in the FTSE 100 at the start of 2024 would be worth today

Last week's dip gives the wrong impression of the FTSE 100, which has had a pretty solid year once dividends…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK REITs: a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity?

As dividend yields hit 10-year highs, Stephen Wright thinks real estate investment trusts could be a great place to consider…

Read more »