Is It A Myth That Blue Chips Are The Safest Shares?

There’s something safer than blue-chip shares according to the world’s richest investor, Warren Buffett…

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

If you think investing in blue-chip shares is safe, think again.

According to Warren Buffett — the world’s richest investor — there’s something better. In his 1961 Buffett Partnership letter, Warren Buffet declared that his investments were more conservative than blue-chip shares.

Pardon?

How can that be true? Surely conservative, successful and safe companies back blue-chip shares such as HSBC Holdings (LSE: HSBA), Vodafone (LSE: VOD) (NASDAQ: VOD.US) and GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US). Firms that private investors, fund managers and pension schemes adore. They are the best and safest investments available, and that’s why they’re blue chip, right?

The trouble with that argument is that many confuse big with blue chip. Real blue chips are hard to find. There are several definitions out there, but I like this one:

“Blue chips are internationally recognised, well- established and financially sound companies. Blue chips generally sell high quality, widely accepted products and services. Blue-chip companies are known to weather downturns and operate profitably in the face of adverse economic conditions, which helps to contribute to their long record of stable and reliable growth.”

Size alone does not make a blue chip. Big cyclical firms such as HSBC and the other London-listed banks create portfolio destruction on a grand scale when times are tough. Such firms fail the ‘known to weather downturns and operate profitably in the face of adverse economic conditions’ part of the definition.Even mighty Vodafone is prone to the cyclicality of its industry, and we saw recently how patent expiry eroded the trading franchises of pharmaceutical firms such as GlaxoSmithKline.

Yet it gets worse. Think of the terminal decline in once-proud industries that we thought had ‘widely accepted products and services‘. How the mighty fell from favour. I’m thinking of names like Eastman Kodak Co, HMV and Yell Group. Look what happened to those bluer-than-blue-chip firms. Go back further and we can recall once-mighty operators such as Austin Motor, Bolsover Colliery, FW Woolworth and Cortaulds — how many investors saw those ‘safe’ blue chips take their investments to the metaphorical grave?

How Buffett did it

It seems to me that investors often look for safe investments that they can buy and hold for a very long time — hence the attraction of the arguably mythical blue chip. More than 50 years ago, during the period that he made his fastest portfolio gains, Warren Buffett shunned that kind of fire-and-forget mentality and didn’t invest in the blue chips of the day. It was many more years and many millions of gain before he uttered the well-known words “our favourite holding period is forever”. The reality of his earliest and most successful investing, in terms of percentage gains, is that his favourite holding period was until he made a good profit, and then he would likely sell.

It’s well known that Buffett traded value: he bought shares when they undervalued a company, and he sold them when the value had ‘outed,’ or when he was showing a decent gain. Sometimes both conditions were present when he sold, and sometimes he just sold to take profits. He made millions by first protecting the down side with a decent margin of safety and then by taking profits when he could. For that strategy to work, he invested in smaller companies than the blue chips of the day. Blue chips then, as now, rarely display the required safety margin due to all the billions pumped into the shares by institutional and private investors.

Buffett considered his small-cap, safety-first strategy to be more conservative than investing in blue chips. His one caveat was that the approach worked best during stagnant or moderately declining markets. Hello! That sound just like the conditions we have right now!

Superior returns

According to Buffett, superior returns are possible, and more safely achievable, by investing in smaller companies than blue chips. That’s unsurprising when we look at the earnings-growth rates available for some of our ‘blue chips’. For example, City analysts expect HSBC to score just 5% growth during 2015, GlaxoSmithKline to post a scant 1% and Vodafone to see a 9% uplift during 2016. Such performance is not likely to set a portfolio on fire.

So, why not build a more conservative portfolio by adding some well-run, smaller companies to the mix, without forgetting that all-important margin of safety. It really is a myth that blue chips and big FTSE 100 firms offer the safest shares. To me, the safest form of investing is to make good returns — it’s amazing how secure a growing cushion of funds makes us feel!

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline and HSBC Holdings. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

After it crashed 25%, should I buy this former stock market darling in my Stocks and Shares ISA?

Harvey Jones has a big hole in his Stocks and Shares ISA that he is keen to fill. Should he…

Read more »

happy senior couple using a laptop in their living room to look at their financial budgets
Investing Articles

How’s the dividend forecast looking for Legal & General shares in 2025 and beyond?

As a shareholder, I like to keep track of the potential dividend returns I could make from my Legal &…

Read more »

artificial intelligence investing algorithms
Investing Articles

Could buying this stock with a $7bn market cap be like investing in Nvidia in 2010?

Where might the next Nvidia-type stock be lurking in today's market? Our writer takes a look at one candidate with…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Is GSK a bargain now the share price is near 1,333p?

Biopharma company GSK looks like a decent stock to consider for the long term, so is today's lower share price…

Read more »

Snowing on Jubilee Gardens in London at dusk
Investing Articles

Could December be a great month to buy UK shares?

Christopher Ruane sees some possible reasons to look for shares to buy in December -- but he'll be using the…

Read more »

Young mixed-race couple sat on the beach looking out over the sea
Investing Articles

Sticking to FTSE shares, I’d still aim for a £1,000 monthly passive income like this!

By investing in blue-chip FTSE shares with proven business models, our writer hopes he can build sizeable passive income streams…

Read more »

Growth Shares

BT shares? I think there are much better UK stocks for the long term

Over the long term, many UK stocks have performed much better than BT. Here’s a look at two companies that…

Read more »

British Pennies on a Pound Note
Investing Articles

After a 540% rise, could this penny share keep going?

This penny share has seen mixed fortunes in recent years. Our writer looks ahead to some potentially exciting developments in…

Read more »