Why You Shouldn’t Let Royal Bank Of Scotland Group plc Look After Your Money

Aye, the Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (LON:RBS) is looking better all the time, but she makes me nervous.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RBS

It was dubbed “the worst banking acquisition of all time”.

Sir Fred Goodwin led a series of acquisitions (including the purchase of NatWest) that turned the Royal Bank of Scotland Group (LSE: RBS) (NYSE: RBS.US) into an international banking giant. It all ended abruptly though with the £70 billion purchase of ABN AMRO. Not only was that deal structured poorly (certainly not in favour of RBS), but its timing (on the eve of the crisis), couldn’t have been much worse. Over a matter of months, RBS’s share price fell from over £6 pounds to 10p.

The prodigal son had to return home. It was bailed out by the state. It’s now 81% owned by the UK government.

So, given all of that, can we now bank on an RBS turnaround? Let’s look at the three C’s of banking.

Cash

The best news about RBS’s bottom line is that it’s seemingly improving. That is, back in May it proudly announced a big jump in its first quarter net profit. It trebled its earnings to £1.2 billion. According to Reuters it was just the 6th time the bank had produced a quarterly profit since it was bailed out. Analysts have pointed to the bank’s better handle on costs, and reduced losses from bad loans, as the reasons the bank’s pushed back into the black.

It’s also good to see the bank’s core business improving. Its net interest margin for the first half rose 20 basis points to 2.17%. That’s moving up towards Barclays’ NIM at 2.96% (up 8bps on its previous result).

So there are a few green shoots coming through — but some investors remain shy. The stock’s price to book ratio is just 0.6. Any decent banking analyst will tell you that’s either a really good sign, or an ominous sign.

Compliance

RBs has a few skeletons in the closet.

In 2013 RBS was fined £390 million for Libor rigging. This coming from a bank that had been bailed out (and is now majority owned) by the taxpayer. That calls for more than just a good spanking. The bank’s also been done for the miss-selling of home loans in the U.S..

Confidence

So the big news  is that chairman, Sir Philip Hampton, is moving to GlaxoSmithKline. The search for a new skipper is under way, but whoever it is, he or she will need to have a strong handle on negotiating with the government — given Treasury’s hold over the bank. This is an awkward issue for the bank.

Looking at its recent strategic plays: I’m not overjoyed by its recent stumble in the U.S.. RBS originally wanted to sell Citizens for between $23 (£14) and $25 a share but the initial public offering was priced at just $21.50. RBS will pocket around $2 billion less than hoped for as a result. It’s my understanding that RBS will look to offload the rest of the bank by 2016. Now analysts say the sale was a response to the government’s and regulators’ call for RBS to focus on lending to U.K. customers and increase its capital strength. See this is what happens when you still ‘live with your folks’ — you can’t make grown-up decisions.

Bonuses are another pain in the bum for the bank. Labour’s been crying foul that bankers on multi-million pound salaries are getting paid million dollar bonuses. Of course the tax payer foots that bill. Bonuses have already been cut by around 85% (yes they were that high to begin with) but they could go down further. They’re certainly not going to rise, putting up enormous barriers for the firm to attract the best talent in The City.

The bank says it’s doing just fine. It’s even confident it’ll achieve a Tier 1 capital ratio (a key measure of a bank’s financial strength) of 11% by the end of 2015. That’s noteworthy.

So yes the bank’s on track, but it hasn’t yet ‘recovered’ from the financial crisis of 2008/2009. As an indicator, the bank’s share price remains well below the 500p level where the taxpayer breaks even on its £45 billion stake in the bank.

I’ll confidently step onto the ship when all the bail water has returned to the ocean. No need to take unnecessary risks right now.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Surely, the Rolls-Royce share price can’t go any higher in 2025?

The Rolls-Royce share price was the best performer on the FTSE 100 in 2023 and so far in 2024. Dr…

Read more »

A young woman sitting on a couch looking at a book in a quiet library space.
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could start buying shares with £100 in January

Our writer explains some of the things he thinks investors on a limited budget should consider before they start buying…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Forget FTSE 100 airlines! I think shares in this company offer better value to consider

Stephen Wright thinks value investors looking for shares to buy should include aircraft leasing company Aercap. But is now the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are Rolls-Royce shares undervalued heading into 2025?

As the new year approaches, Rolls-Royce shares are the top holding of a US fund recommended by Warren Buffett. But…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£20k in a high-interest savings account? It could be earning more passive income in stocks

Millions of us want a passive income, but a high-interest savings account might not be the best way to do…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 tried and tested ways to earn passive income in 2025

Our writer examines the latest market trends and economic forecasts to uncover three great ways to earn passive income in…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s what £10k invested in the FTSE 100 at the start of 2024 would be worth today

Last week's dip gives the wrong impression of the FTSE 100, which has had a pretty solid year once dividends…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK REITs: a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity?

As dividend yields hit 10-year highs, Stephen Wright thinks real estate investment trusts could be a great place to consider…

Read more »