I recently took a look at how an investment in ARM Holdings 10 years ago would have fared, and the result would have been nothing short of spectacular.
ARM, of course, has been almost a pure growth play — although the effect of even its very modest dividends was significant. And that set me thinking about how a pure dividend play that had experienced no capital growth over 10 years would have done.
As it happens, J Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY) fits that bill just fine, though not through the company’s design. With the woes of the supermarket sector epitomised by Tesco‘s fall from grace, Sainsbury shares are priced at almost exactly the same level now as they were ten years ago to the day — 261p as I write against 263p back then.
Passive income stocks: our picks
Do you like the idea of dividend income?
The prospect of investing in a company just once, then sitting back and watching as it potentially pays a dividend out over and over?
If you’re excited by the thought of regular passive income payments, as well as the potential for significant growth on your initial investment…
Then we think you’ll want to see this report inside Motley Fool Share Advisor — ‘5 Essential Stocks For Passive Income Seekers’.
What’s more, today we’re giving away one of these stock picks, absolutely free!
No change over 10 years
That’s a fall of 0.7% over the period, and it would have turned an investment of £10,000 this time in 2004 into £9,924 today, for a loss of £76 — and I doubt there’s a FTSE 100 stock that has been closer to flat than that.
Now, how much difference did those all-important dividends make?
Well, 2004’s dividend was cut quite hard from the previous year’s, so we’re starting from a rebased low level. We’d still have seen a 3% yield that year, and since then the annual cash has been hiked every single year — from 7.8p per share for the year ended March 2005, Sainsbury’s dividend was up to 17.3p by 2014.
The yield slipped during the first few years of our decade as Sainsbury shares got into a bit of a bubble, but that faded and yields over the past few years have come in at around 4-5%.
The overall result
Dividends would have added an extra £4,949 to our total, and taken that initial £10,000 to £14,873 — and though a 48.7% gain over ten years is not great by stockmarket standards, it would still have comfortably beaten cash in a savings account at the bank.
That’s taking the cash each year, so what would have happened if we’d reinvested our dividends every year instead?
If a share price is flat overall over a lengthy period, intervening volatility would, on average, be expected to contribute positively towards our end result if we keep on investing throughout. But in the case of Sainsbury, the whole of the period saw prices higher than today’s, so reinvestment would actually have lost us some money.
We’d have ended with £14,503, which is £369 less than if we’d just kept the cash — but still 45% up.
Hindsight not allowed
Obviously we can’t use this hindsight to pick and choose which company dividends to reinvest and which to keep, but it does show us that reinvesting dividends is not guaranteed to enhance our profits — though if we expect a generally rising stockmarket, on average it should be a good thing to do.
But the bottom-line lesson is that dividends matter — a lot!
