Defence giant BAE Systems (LSE: BA) (NASDAQOTH: BAESY.US) is a core element of many investors’ income portfolios — including my own.
The firm’s share price performance has matched that of the FTSE 100 over the last five years, climbing by around 45%, but BAE’s high yield has helped the defence giant beat the index, with BAE delivering an average total return (capital gains plus dividends) of 11.9% per year, compared to 11.1% for the FTSE 100.
However, BAE’s dividend could be losing its shine: the firm is only expected to increase its payout by 1.4% this year, and by 2.4% next year.
Passive income stocks: our picks
Do you like the idea of dividend income?
The prospect of investing in a company just once, then sitting back and watching as it potentially pays a dividend out over and over?
If you’re excited by the thought of regular passive income payments, as well as the potential for significant growth on your initial investment…
Then we think you’ll want to see this report inside Motley Fool Share Advisor — ‘5 Essential Stocks For Passive Income Seekers’.
What’s more, today we’re giving away one of these stock picks, absolutely free!
Problems?
Let’s start with the basics: how is BAE valued against its historic and forecast performance?
|
P/E ratio |
Current value |
|
P/E using 5-year average adjusted earnings per share |
11.1 |
|
2-year average forecast P/E |
12.0 |
Source: Company reports, consensus forecasts
On the face of it, BAE looks very reasonably priced, especially given its 4.4% prospective yield.
However, BAE has been struggling to grow in recent years, thanks mainly to budget cutbacks in the UK and US — the firm’s two biggest markets.
Is BAE cheap because it’s a business that’s stagnating — or shrinking?
Fundamental shrinkage
A closer look at BAE’s accounts from the last five years suggests that BAE’s business may indeed be shrinking slightly:
|
5-year compound average growth rate |
Value |
|
Sales |
-3.6% |
|
Underlying earnings |
-2.6% |
|
Underlying earnings per share |
1.4% |
|
Dividend |
+4.7% |
Source: Company reports
Annual turnover has fallen by an average of 3.6% per year since 2009, while underlying earnings (defined by the firm as earnings before interest, taxation and amortisation, or EBITA), have fallen by an average of 2.6% per year over the same period.
Investors have been consoled with dividend growth averaging 4.7% per year, but the apparent annual growth in the firm’s underlying earnings per share should be treated with caution: it contradicts BAE’s falling profits, and is mainly the result of the company’s ongoing share buyback programme, which totalled £212m in 2013 alone.
Uncertain outlook
I don’t think BAE’s problems are bad enough to warrant selling the stock, but I only rate it as a hold at present, not a buy.
One of my concerns is that City consensus forecasts for the firm’s earnings have been downgraded steadily this year: the current forecast, for earnings per share of 37.6p in 2014, is almost 5% lower than it was just three months ago.
In my view, BAE’s shrinking sales and profits are a warning that the current share price might not be as cheap as it seems. I believe it might pay to wait a little longer, before buying any more of the firm’s shares.
