The Buy Case For GlaxoSmithKline plc Is Getting Stronger Every Day

GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) is cheap compared to close peer AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) is looking more and more attractive as an investment every day.

Indeed, as the company’s share price continues to decline, following the release of its downbeat half-year results, Glaxo is getting cheaper and cheaper. 

Undervaluedgsk

Glaxo’s shares are now trading at a 52-week low and for this reason the company looks significantly undervalued in comparison to its peers.  In particular, the average P/E of Glaxo’s major international peers, including Eli LillyMerckPfizer, Roche and Sanofi is around 23.7.

At present, Glaxo is only trading at a historic P/E of 13.5.

Further, Glaxo’s London listed peer, AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) is currently trading at a historic P/E of 14.9 and forward P/E of 17.6, which makes Glaxo’s valuation look even more appealing.

Then there’s Glaxo’s dividend yield, which currently stands at 5.3%, compared to Astra’s 3.7%. Oh, and I can’t forget Glaxo’s proposed return of cash to investors, scheduled to take place next year.

Specifically, Glaxo’s recent deal with Novartis netted the company £4bn, which management has promised to return to investors next year. The cash return will come as a one-off payout via a B share scheme of approximately 80p per share.

Behind the valuation

Glaxo’s low valuation can be blamed on the company’s recent downbeat half-year report. The group reported that second quarter core operating profit plummeted 25%, or 14% on a constant exchange rate basis. Turnover fell 13%, or 4% at constant exchange rates, while core earnings per share fell 25% to 19.1p.

Nevertheless, aside from these poor headline figures, Glaxo did make solid progress throughout the first half of the year. The sales of new HIV treatments jumped 13%, while pharmaceutical and vaccines sales rose 11% within emerging markets.

Additionally, Glaxo’s pipeline of treatments under development remains substantial, with over 40 new treatments in late stage development. Then there is the company’s aforementioned deal with Novartis, set to complete during the first half of next year.

The deal will see Glaxo dispose of its oncology portfolio for $16bn, while acquiring Novartis’ global Vaccines business for $5.3bn.

Further, as part of the deal Glaxo and Novartis will create a new Consumer Healthcare business, with 2013 pro forma revenues of £6.5 billion. Glaxo will be the majority shareholder in this venture.  

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Rupert Hargreaves owns shares of GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool recommends GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

£2k in savings? Consider putting it here for maximum passive income

Where’s the best place to park a £2k lump sum for maximum passive income? This Fool knows exactly where his…

Read more »

Young Caucasian woman with pink her studying from her laptop screen
Investing Articles

Where will the ITV share price go in 2025? Here’s what the experts say

The ITV share price has been heading up and down as the TV producer and broadcaster has been making the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 rules I followed to start investing

Christopher Ruane shares a trio of considerations he used to start investing in the stock market -- and continues to…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK investors are obsessed with Nvidia stock! Here’s why

This writer considers a few reasons why Nvidia stock has gone up so dramatically in recent years and whether he'd…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Cheap FTSE 100 shares to consider buying after the Black Friday sales

Whatever bargains retailers are offering for Black Friday, stock brokers aren't joining in. I reckon I see enough cheap shares…

Read more »

Petrochemical engineer working at night with digital tablet inside oil and gas refinery plant
Investing Articles

P/E ratio of 6! Is the Centrica share price a bargain?

This writer reckons the current Centrica share price could be a real bargain. But as a former shareholder, will he…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

What sort of British companies has Warren Buffett invested in – and why?

Warren Buffett has fished on both sides of the pond over the decades in a hunt for bargain shares. Our…

Read more »

Long-term vs short-term investing concept on a staircase
Investing Articles

Here’s how I’m investing in dividend shares to aim for long-term wealth

Our writer plans to turn investments in dividend shares into a retirement pot by implementing a structured, long-term approach.

Read more »