How Strong Are Banco Santander SA’s Dividends?

Banco Santander SA (LON: BNC) is renowned for its super-high yields.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

SantanderShares in Banco Santander (LSE: BNC) (NYSE: SAN.US) have soared by more than 30% over the past 12 months to 587p, while the FTSE 100 has struggled to manage a 3% rise.

And that’s in a year when the bank’s dividend is expected to be cut by a couple of percent over the next two years, and after the shares finished 2013 on a lofty P/E of 17. So what gives?

To answer that, we need to look at Santander’s historical dividends and at what lay behind them.

Enormous yield

In 2013 the bank provided shareholders with a whopping 8.8% dividend yield, and its value exceeded Santander’s actual earnings by 50%! Still, at least earnings did rise that year. 2012 concluded four years of declining earnings, but still brought a dividend yield of 9.7% — the dividend amounted to 2.6 times earnings that year!

Santander was able to get away with such high dividends because the majority of shareholders have traditionally elected to take its scrip offering instead of cash. So the bank doesn’t actually have to hand over any cash, it just issues more shares to take care of it.

Of course, there’s no such thing as a free dividend, and that practice leads to ever more dilution of each subsequent year’s earnings.

Scaling back

Such high yields do also attract more and more people wanting actual cash, so something has to be done. To that end, with earnings forecast to rise strongly over the next two years and the dividend expected to be cut back gradually, we should see Santander moving towards a more conventional and sustainable dividend model — and by December 2015 the dividend should even be covered by earnings for the first time since 2010.

We have a current consensus for a 23% rise in earnings per share (EPS) for this year followed by a further 20% for 2015. That should provide dividend cover of 1.2 times by 2015 — not enough, but much better — and it would drop the P/E from last year’s 17 to 12 this year and around 10 the year after.

The yields will still be high, with 7.6% and 6.8% penciled in for 2014 and 2015 respectively, but I’d expect it to drop to the 4-5% range within five years.

Still attractive

Santander is still a bank that is capable of rewarding shareholders well, despite its quirky dividend policy of the past few years. It’s well worth remembering what the bank said at the time of its 2013 annual results…

The total shareholder return, based on the share price performance plus the dividend, was 43.5% between the beginning of 2008 and the end of 2013, compared with an average 17.4% for European banks.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the shares mentioned.

More on Investing Articles

Google office headquarters
Investing Articles

1 reason I like buying S&P 500 shares – and 1 reason I don’t

Will this investor try to improve his potential returns by focusing more on S&P 500 shares instead of British ones?…

Read more »

Young woman holding up three fingers
Investing Articles

3 SIPP mistakes to avoid

Our writer explains a trio of potentially costly errors he tries to avoid making when investing his SIPP, on an…

Read more »

Smiling white woman holding iPhone with Airpods in ear
Investing Articles

Here’s how (and why) I’d start buying shares with £25 a week

Our writer uses his investment experience and current approach to explain how he would start buying shares on a limited…

Read more »

Aerial shot showing an aircraft shadow flying over an idyllic beach
Investing Articles

Here’s my 5-step approach to earning passive income of £500 a month

Christopher Ruane explains the handful of steps he uses to target hundreds of pounds in passive income each month.

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 UK shares I’ve been buying this week

From a value perspective, UK shares look attractive. But two in particular have been attracting Stephen Wright’s attention over the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

A lifelong second income for just £10 a week? Here’s how!

With a simple, structured approach to buying blue-chip dividend shares at attractive prices, our writer's building a second income for…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s how I’d use a £20k Stocks and Shares ISA to help build generational wealth

Discover how our writer would aim to turn a £20k Stocks and Shares ISA into a sizeable nest egg by…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Billionaire Warren Buffett just bought shares of Domino’s Pizza. Should I grab a slice?

Our writer takes a look at a few reasons why Domino's Pizza stock might have appealed to Warren Buffett's Berkshire…

Read more »