Should British American Tobacco plc And Imperial Tobacco Group PLC Shareholders Be Worried By A $24bn Damages Award?

No grounds for complacency at British American Tobacco plc (LON:BATS) and Imperial Tobacco Group PLC (LON:IMT)

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

british american tobacco / imperial tobaccoNews that a Florida court has awarded $23.6bn to the widow of a smoker who died of lung cancer might have caused some spluttering in the boardrooms of both BAT (LSE: BATS) and Imperial Tobacco (LSE: IMT) . The award — mainly punitive damages — was made against US tobacco giant Reynolds America.

BAT is directly affected: it owns 42% of Reynolds, and is about to pump another $5bn of cash into the company to maintain its shareholding after Reynolds acquires rival Lorillard. Meanwhile, Imperial is spending $7bn to acquire brands being shed as a result of the deal. Those assets come with indemnities against health-related litigation, but being propelled from number 5 to number 3 in the market will surely put Imperial more in the firing line of future litigation. BP and the banks are testimony that US courts are unsympathetic to foreign firms.

Whatever the boardroom reaction, investors seem to have shrugged it off with the shares of both BAT and Imperial just down a percent or two. The expectation is that such a massive award will be slashed on appeal. Its constitutional basis is suspect, and the tobacco industry has seen this before: in 2002 a Los Angeles court imposed a fine of $28bn on Philip Morris, subsequently reduced by a factor of 1,000 to $28m.

Complacent

I wonder if investors are being unduly complacent. I don’t doubt the massive award will be cut. But it rested on an earlier ruling that litigants need only prove that a smoker was addicted to tobacco and that tobacco caused his or her death: it’s not necessary to establish any wrongdoing. That’s symptomatic of the tide of public opinion, which is turning fast against Big Tobacco.

Though there are still some areas of growth, the tobacco industry faces a structurally declining market. Thus consolidation, to maintain profits and cash flow, is the name of the game. It should drive dividend payments and M&A activity for some years yet.

E-cigarettes

Meanwhile the saviour of the industry could be e-cigarettes. However, they could also turn out to be the disruptive technology that accelerates the industry’s decline. With plain packing legislation reducing the value of brands and uncertainty over government and medical attitudes to e-cigarettes, it’s not certain that the new industry needs Big Tobacco. Why saddle yourself with those unquantifiable litigation liabilities?

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Tony Reading has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the shares mentioned.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Surely, the Rolls-Royce share price can’t go any higher in 2025?

The Rolls-Royce share price was the best performer on the FTSE 100 in 2023 and so far in 2024. Dr…

Read more »

A young woman sitting on a couch looking at a book in a quiet library space.
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could start buying shares with £100 in January

Our writer explains some of the things he thinks investors on a limited budget should consider before they start buying…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Forget FTSE 100 airlines! I think shares in this company offer better value to consider

Stephen Wright thinks value investors looking for shares to buy should include aircraft leasing company Aercap. But is now the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are Rolls-Royce shares undervalued heading into 2025?

As the new year approaches, Rolls-Royce shares are the top holding of a US fund recommended by Warren Buffett. But…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£20k in a high-interest savings account? It could be earning more passive income in stocks

Millions of us want a passive income, but a high-interest savings account might not be the best way to do…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 tried and tested ways to earn passive income in 2025

Our writer examines the latest market trends and economic forecasts to uncover three great ways to earn passive income in…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s what £10k invested in the FTSE 100 at the start of 2024 would be worth today

Last week's dip gives the wrong impression of the FTSE 100, which has had a pretty solid year once dividends…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK REITs: a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity?

As dividend yields hit 10-year highs, Stephen Wright thinks real estate investment trusts could be a great place to consider…

Read more »